ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum

Go Back   ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum > Wrestling > World Wrestling Entertainment

World Wrestling Entertainment Come here to discuss anything about World Wrestling Entertainment.

Undertaker to smackdown=A good thing
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 Aug 2002, 04:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
iamsucky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Undertaker to smackdown=A good thing

Undertaker to smackdown was actually a very good move by the WWE. Since they are really the only two Huge names left with Hogan, Austin, and Rock gone, it is good that they are on two seperate shows. The main reason why it is a good move is because now HHH and Taker cannot get to each other. Instead of wrestling each other over and over again they can elevate the new talent on each show. Maybe we will see an RVD vs HHH, or Taker vs Chris Benoit (after he jobs to Lesnar at unforgiven). Either way, both of them sound better then another Taker vs HHH fued.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 04:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I disagree with the statement that Taker Hunter is not a good fued. Both these men, if give free reign can put on a great fued, one that can last longer then the month long fueds we have been subjected to for the last year or so.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 04:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Blu Angel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default I do agree about Taker

Actually it was time for Taker to make the move..Many of the Wrestlers move from areas to areas. This mainly helps them to not become stale, Taker had been with Raw pretty much exclusive (except for month) since the split.

When he rolled in that crowd went crazy.Best pops all night.To just look at the difference in the talent from Raw..Of course he will feud with Brock,probably Batista, and some of the others. Will be a big change for him where he seemed to only be paired with the UnAmericans.

The darn pre season football game made it 10pm for Smackdown but it was worth the wait to see it..
  Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 05:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
I'm Kidding
 
Jobbin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 315
Rep Power: 17
Jobbin' is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dark Maiden
I disagree with the statement that Taker Hunter is not a good fued. Both these men, if give free reign can put on a great fued, one that can last longer then the month long fueds we have been subjected to for the last year or so.
I completely disagree. I think Triple H and Undertaker would not put on an entertaining feud, no matter how much time there were given. Undertaker isn't nearly as good as he once was, and he doesn't sell... and Triple H is a glory hog who's had one really good match since coming back (against Michaels).

Did you hear the crowd on Raw during their match? It was pretty dead. No-one wants Triple H vs. Undertaker anymore... it's just not entertaining. Wrestlemania X7 was a suprisingly great match, a great way to end a great feud... but neither The Undertaker or Triple H are in the same league they once were back then.
__________________
Jobbin' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 05:39 PM   #5 (permalink)
MetalKrist
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm very glad he moved to Smackdown.

Why? Because I do not get Smackdown.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 07:41 PM   #6 (permalink)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry Moddin, I know you are wrong about what Taker can do and about what Taker and hunter can do, if allowed to, in the ring.

Yes Hunter is a glory hound, but the best way to keep him from getting in to the younger wrestlers way, is to put him in matches with the more established ppl like Taker.

You can not look at their last match for anything, couse it was not even ment for anthing. All it was, was to set up for the pounch line later in the night about Brock going to SD. And the ppv one, had an injured Hunter in it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 07:57 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator Of Good & Evil
 
The Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Walking upon high, as I step to the edge to see my world below..
Posts: 6,505
Rep Power: 151
The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.The Wanderer , if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.
Default

I don't know...I think Taker going to Smackdown is a mistake... like many of you stated, a war between Him and HHH would be rather nice now. But I guess since Kane's back, they shiped him over to SD instead..thats my guess
__________________
The Wanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 09:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
iamsucky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dark Maiden
Sorry Moddin, I know you are wrong about what Taker can do and about what Taker and hunter can do, if allowed to, in the ring.

Yes Hunter is a glory hound, but the best way to keep him from getting in to the younger wrestlers way, is to put him in matches with the more established ppl like Taker.

You can not look at their last match for anything, couse it was not even ment for anthing. All it was, was to set up for the pounch line later in the night about Brock going to SD. And the ppv one, had an injured Hunter in it.
Hopefully Kane will not take takers place in the fued with the Unamericans. No one gives a fuck about the Unamericans, it just that they keep on dissing America so they get a cheap crowd reaction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 09:41 PM   #9 (permalink)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't know for sure about this move. Raw seems to be more storyline driven and Smackdown more wrestling driven. The taker is a great character but, can he still keep his matches interesting? I'd say he's better off on Raw. This brand extension isn't working, so why not just forget about it? Let Bischoff and Steph go into a ratings war and have each G.M try to get the bigger named superstars to appear on their show for the main event? That way the WWE would be able to keep the wrestlers that are getting a positive fan response on t.v. They're doing it anyway with having Brock in the audience on Raw just before the Rock and Brock match.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 10:22 PM   #10 (permalink)
In love with Cherelle
 
Duece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 17
Duece is on a distinguished road
Default

a good change up for Taker
Duece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 11:21 PM   #11 (permalink)
Give it To Me..
 
The_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Charlottesville Va.
Posts: 14,488
Rep Power: 2568
The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.The_One should go home and get his fuckin' shinebox.
Send a message via AIM to The_One Send a message via MSN to The_One
Default

I'm sor of half and half on this i liked taker on raw but smackdown give's him a chance to feud with guys like benoit and angle so all in all....
__________________
The_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Aug 2002, 11:26 PM   #12 (permalink)
CANUCKER
 
Slikums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,150
Rep Power: 18
Slikums is on a distinguished road
Default

Taker goign to SD was a bad move...SD already has to many main eventers, SD doesn't need anymore maineventers...RAW needs the maineventers!!! now its even more un even..y..y...y...y..y..y????? damn u WWE damn u Taker was just fine on RAW!!!!
__________________

If ya SMEEELLLLLLLL what THE ROCK.... whoa whoa whoa whao! this isn't karaoke night! u do not sing along with THE ROCK! THE ROCK is the only and THE ROCK MEANS ONLY ONE that says this u mother canuckers!! IS COOKING!


^^Raven's House Of Clockwork Orange^^

Slikums is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oral sex in a couple : good or bad thing? Matthew Bellamy Archives 14 28 Nov 2002 02:43 AM
Undertaker On Smackdown sucka World Wrestling Entertainment 7 15 Nov 2002 10:16 PM
YES! Undertaker returns on SmackDown! Undertaker World Wrestling Entertainment 20 11 Nov 2002 08:57 AM
Smackdown- good or not so good Wolf World Wrestling Entertainment 7 04 Oct 2002 04:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.

Attribution:
Powered by Yahoo Answers



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.