ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum

Go Back   ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum > Wrestling > General Wrestling

General Wrestling Any non-WWE/TNA wrestling discussion goes in here. This includes wrestling history.

Agree or Disagree: TNA has not creativity + WQ Inside?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03 Oct 2010, 04:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
Young Noob
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 8
Lg Kllr (24 - 26) is on a distinguished road
Default Agree or Disagree: TNA has not creativity + WQ Inside?

I agree. Why look at these:































* The Pope D'Angelo Dinero = Reverand Devon (Devon Dudley) (WWE)































* Douglas Williams = William Regal(WWE)































* Abyss = Kane































and a lot more, even copyrighting storylines and gimmicks which WWE had before TNA.































Do you agree or Disagree?































WQ: Should the Kane and Undertaker cell match go for atleast half an hour?































* Mr. Ken Anderson = Mr. Ken Kennedy (WWE)















* HAS NO CREATIVITY*































If you say WWE copied off WCW, then you might be right, but type in WCW on google, it is a registed trademark of WWE. (Since they bought WCW out along with ECW)















yea Laycool = Beautiful People.















But i dont really give a damn abotu Laycool.















lolz King; soz about that mistake, but TNA could have had a complete different charcatser for Ken, not just name change, he still got the same gimmick with the mic and all.
Lg Kllr (24 - 26) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 Oct 2010, 04:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Young Noob
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8
J.Perez is on a distinguished road
Default

I might agree with the Douglas Williams part, but I think Pope is more charismatic than the Reverend D-Von gimmick and Abyss is a little more like a mix of Mankind (psychotic) and Cactus Jack, but I don't necessarily agree that TNA copies WWE gimmicks.































WQ: A little less, I don't expect anything to long.































*I agree that Mr. Anderson=Mr. Kennedy in terms of obviously being the same person, but Mr. Anderson is definitely more entertaining than Mr. Kennedy and is used a lot better than he was used in WWE.
J.Perez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 Oct 2010, 04:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Jobber
 
King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the north
Posts: 201
Rep Power: 15
King is on a distinguished road
Default

I dont like TNA but this is a very stupid reason to hate it































The Pope = not really i see similarity but it's not a complete ripoff































Abyss = more like mankind and kane fuse together so KANEKIND! i kinda like it tho i wish kane was more like this and it's not a complete rip off to me































Mr ken anderson = Mr. Ken kennedy = THEY'RE THE SAME PERSON YOU IDIOT!















































It's not that TNA has no creativity but WWE already did about all the stuff there is to do. TNA did come up with sum original stuff like the Ultimate X match and Lethal Lockdown match































if you want to give a better examples than it should be this































Shark Boy = Stone Cold















Orlando Screwjob = Montreal Screwjob































uhh thats all i can think for now
King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 Oct 2010, 04:42 AM   #4 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 166
Rep Power: 8
sharpshooter is on a distinguished road
Default

Agree, because when TNA tries to be creative, its not that great. But here is the thing, its tough to be creative with all the things that has already been done. If your job is an inventor or writer, Damn, sucks to be you. But if you ask me, most of the thing TNA does is actually meant to parody WWE. Jeff Jarrett is a co-founder of TNA with a grudge against WWE, so it makes sense. Like Shark Boy is an obvious parody of Stone Cold Steve Austin. Plus their Florida screwjob was meant to parody WWE's montreal screwjob. So usually when they copy, its meant to add insult, which I think its funny. Its like, trying to do something that WWE has done, but not screw it up. The latest one is the one with ECW, but here is when I say it, when TNA tries to be creative, they fail. I mean, really. They need new writers. I felt the ECW thing should had ended on that PPV, but they kept going. Tsk-tsk. Should had quitted while they were ahead. So to me, copying is not a big deal. Everybody does it, especially comedians. They are the worst. So when TNA does copy them, its no big deal, as WWE probably copied off someone else and so on, and its done to make fun of WWE. Thats not that bad. But yeah, still, even when TNA tries to be creative on their own, its doesn't come out as great. I mean, the Beautiful People is probably TNA's best original concept, but it wasn't far off from WWE's Vince's Devil. WWE's wasn't that successful, but TNA made it huge. So if TNA does copy WWE, I'm okay with it, as its not a big deal, but the big question is, can they make it better. Some thing, TNA doesn't do a lot, but it could improve.































P.S. Abyss is actually suppose to be more like Mankind. Just saying. And Ken Anderson and Ken Kennedy are really just the same guy. In fact, Ken Anderson is his real name. Its not really copying a gimmick if both brand chooses to just use the guy as he is, and believe it or not, He really is like that in real life.































WQ: It should. I hope so. If Undertaker and Kane are on their last stretch of their feud, I hope it would be memorable, and with that, longer and more epic matches are memorable.
sharpshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 Oct 2010, 04:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 8
komets.geo is on a distinguished road
Default

Well if you don't like tna for that reason, then you also have to hate the wwe. The wwe has taken more ideas from other companies than any wrestling company in history. When they used to take ideas from wcw, ecw or other companies they did NOT own them. The wwe also takes many things from movies or tv shows and make it look like they thought it up. Sure not everything about tna is perfect, but STOP being such a wwe mark. You sound like you are maybe 10 or 12 years old.















The wwe STILL takes ideas that are started in independent wrestling. So again if that is your reason for hating tna, then you need to start hating the wwe.
komets.geo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Agree or Disagree: People who tell you that Wrestling is fake (more inside) + WQ? Lg Kllr (24 - 26) General Wrestling 6 02 Oct 2010 08:39 AM
My list of superstars most skilled at promos. Agree or disagree? if you disagree, what is yours? Equal rights for black male P. General Wrestling 5 10 Sep 2010 02:20 PM
Agree or Disagree: WWE SmackDown needs a push (More inside)? The Great One Eric Semi-Retired General Wrestling 10 02 Sep 2010 12:18 PM
Agree or Disagree..........? ?Ace Viper? General Wrestling 7 25 May 2010 05:03 PM
wwe:agree or disagree? Dana !s TARAfied General Wrestling 17 17 Feb 2010 12:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.

Attribution:
Powered by Yahoo Answers



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.