Which is the BETTER booker/creative genius: Paul Heyman or Vince McMahon + BQ?

(10.10.10)The War is NOT over.. · 12 Sep 2010, 10:58 AM

BQ: Agree or Disagree: TNA should end ReACTION and add a third hour to iMPACT!

L.M.6.9 · 12 Sep 2010, 11:02 AM

Vince McMahon simple because WWE rulzz and TNGay drulzz

BQ: Disagree. TNGay are just WWE wannabes.

EMW · 12 Sep 2010, 11:10 AM

I can't say any one of them are booking geniuses, I think most of the success they've had was great circumstances and chance. I don't think Vince was the one who set back and said, HHH, Shawn Michaels, Undertaker, Mankind, and The Rock are gonna be my biggest stars. And Paul Heyman didn't say the same thing about Taz, RVD, Lance Storm, and eventually Benoit and Guerrero later.

BQ: No, they should focus on developing more in the 2hrs they have instead of being WWE-lite.

Straight Edge Suicide . · 12 Sep 2010, 11:20 AM

Paul Heyman . I don't think he writes for TNA, but he is a hell of a great one .

BQ: Yes, in my opinions ReAction is boring .

Alberto Del Rio · 12 Sep 2010, 11:22 AM

vince mcmahon wwe 1# wreselig company in the world

Lucas Simms · 12 Sep 2010, 11:27 AM

McMAhon is and always will be better than TNA. WWE is always better.

BQ: What's the use. It's not like the ratings will be getting any higher.

Rassling Fundamentals · 12 Sep 2010, 11:33 AM

Vince was never the booker genius of WWE....it was Pat Patterson or Dusty Rhodes or JJ Dillion or Bill Watts or Jerry Jarrett. Vince just gave the final say to put on air....its not like he came up with original creative concepts.

Paul Heyman just let people do whatever.....and made it a point to hate on the Network or the big boys.

naw Impact should be 2 hours of nothing but wrestling and Reaction should be nothing but talk.

12 Sep 2010, 10:58 AM	#1 (permalink)
(10.10.10)The War is NOT over.. Jobber Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 140 Rep Power: 9	Which is the BETTER booker/creative genius: Paul Heyman or Vince McMahon + BQ? BQ: Agree or Disagree: TNA should end ReACTION and add a third hour to iMPACT!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Eric Bischoff vs. Paul Heyman vs. Vince Russo?	Emmamia	General Wrestling	7	02 Jul 2010 03:12 AM
If Paul Heyman took over TNA creative team as usual, do you think...?	Ty B$	General Wrestling	6	14 Jun 2010 09:07 PM
Vince Russo Leaving TNA's Creative Team? Paul Heyman To Takeover?	Victor J	General Wrestling	6	20 Apr 2010 05:04 PM
Paul Heyman officially Joins The Vince Mcmahon Kiss My Ass Club!!	BOSTON	World Wrestling Entertainment	13	06 Jul 2006 10:54 AM
Mr. Marbles: Creative Genius, or, uh, um something else?	Ghetto Monkey	Archives	10	17 Nov 2002 02:49 PM

12 Sep 2010, 11:02 AM	#2 (permalink)
L.M.6.9 Young Noob Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 67 Rep Power: 9	Vince McMahon simple because WWE rulzz and TNGay drulzz BQ: Disagree. TNGay are just WWE wannabes.

12 Sep 2010, 11:10 AM	#3 (permalink)
EMW Young Noob Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 74 Rep Power: 9	I can't say any one of them are booking geniuses, I think most of the success they've had was great circumstances and chance. I don't think Vince was the one who set back and said, HHH, Shawn Michaels, Undertaker, Mankind, and The Rock are gonna be my biggest stars. And Paul Heyman didn't say the same thing about Taz, RVD, Lance Storm, and eventually Benoit and Guerrero later. BQ: No, they should focus on developing more in the 2hrs they have instead of being WWE-lite.

12 Sep 2010, 11:20 AM	#4 (permalink)
Straight Edge Suicide . Jobber Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 415 Rep Power: 9	Paul Heyman . I don't think he writes for TNA, but he is a hell of a great one . BQ: Yes, in my opinions ReAction is boring .

12 Sep 2010, 11:22 AM	#5 (permalink)
Alberto Del Rio Jobber Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 333 Rep Power: 9	vince mcmahon wwe 1# wreselig company in the world

12 Sep 2010, 11:27 AM	#6 (permalink)
Lucas Simms Young Noob Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 51 Rep Power: 9	McMAhon is and always will be better than TNA. WWE is always better. BQ: What's the use. It's not like the ratings will be getting any higher.

12 Sep 2010, 11:33 AM	#7 (permalink)
Rassling Fundamentals Heavyweight Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 1,144 Rep Power: 10	Vince was never the booker genius of WWE....it was Pat Patterson or Dusty Rhodes or JJ Dillion or Bill Watts or Jerry Jarrett. Vince just gave the final say to put on air....its not like he came up with original creative concepts. Paul Heyman just let people do whatever.....and made it a point to hate on the Network or the big boys. naw Impact should be 2 hours of nothing but wrestling and Reaction should be nothing but talk.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)