ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum

Go Back   ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum > Wrestling > General Wrestling

General Wrestling Any non-WWE/TNA wrestling discussion goes in here. This includes wrestling history.

Do you think they should really get rid of the rematch clause?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06 Apr 2010, 12:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Fresh Noob
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 0
$$$????????$$$ is on a distinguished road
Default Do you think they should really get rid of the rematch clause?

I mean its really not giving chance to the other talents.
$$$????????$$$ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 Apr 2010, 12:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 254
Rep Power: 9
Bill Nye is on a distinguished road
Default

I think the rematch shouldn't be used on a PPV, if im paying 44 dollars I wanna see something new..































And watch Batista beat Cena at Extreme Rulez then Cena says he wants his rematch Clause for the next ppv
Bill Nye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 Apr 2010, 12:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 9
LatrellP23(WWE-Mark) is on a distinguished road
Default

No its fair, and its revenge, like fluke victories for example, or cheap way victories































Yes, Keep It
LatrellP23(WWE-Mark) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 Apr 2010, 12:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 391
Rep Power: 9
Arron is on a distinguished road
Default

No its just a way to continue a bitter fued































extreme rulz in free on ppv in the uk
Arron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 Apr 2010, 12:32 PM   #5 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 9
Nathan H is on a distinguished road
Default

I don't think they should eliminate the rematch clause, but I think they should revise it. There are certain times when the rematch clause should not come in to place. Wrestlemania should end rivalries. I feel rematches just ruin the ppv match.
Nathan H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 Apr 2010, 12:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Fresh Noob
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 0
cmb(the one and only) is on a distinguished road
Default

I think it should be used to continue a fued, but the champ should retain so it doesn't end up like last year with Cena and Orton.
cmb(the one and only) is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Since when did you have to use your rematch clause for the Championship the night you lose it? chaos General Wrestling 2 03 Apr 2010 02:30 PM
What happened to Chris Jericho's rematch clause ? Simply Edgehead General Wrestling 4 03 Apr 2010 02:22 PM
Do you think Dreamer might go to TNA after his no compete clause is up? Xena ? General Wrestling 5 19 Mar 2010 05:32 AM
Is it necessay for TNA to do this or does the 90 no compete clause make it harder to pull off now? ghosthunter20068 General Wrestling 1 18 Mar 2010 11:05 AM
Why are rematch clause hardy used anymore? hbk_619_fan General Wrestling 6 25 Feb 2010 02:39 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Attribution:
Powered by Yahoo Answers



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.