ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum

Go Back   ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum > Wrestling > General Wrestling

General Wrestling Any non-WWE/TNA wrestling discussion goes in here. This includes wrestling history.

Why do people think that just because WWE is PG, that it sucks?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 Jun 2014, 05:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Young Noob
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 5
Sam: The Ultimate Underdog is on a distinguished road
Default Why do people think that just because WWE is PG, that it sucks?

WWE is still kick a$$ and it has been doing that for a while. WWE has always been PG and I had not trouble with it at all. The only time it wasn't PG was during the Attitude and Ruthless Agression Era but that was because WWE was still trying to take down competition. I honestly believe WWE is still great and it's way better than that overrate TV-14 crap called TNA. Besides an television rating has nothing to do with with the current product of the company. WWE can still be PG and still be awesome. TNA can still be TV-14 and be very boring, and last time I watched TNA, I was literally bored after 1 hour I decided to flip the channel.
Sam: The Ultimate Underdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 Jun 2014, 05:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Fresh Noob
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Lazlo101 is on a distinguished road
Default

They probably think it's automatically for young kids, I guess.































WWE is still decent, just not a big fan.
Lazlo101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 Jun 2014, 05:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 6
Lee Everett is on a distinguished road
Default

It does suck most of those chicks are straight up whores. Damn this is PG. I forgot I cant use that word. The only diva in this era I have respect for is Eve Torres.
Lee Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 Jun 2014, 05:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Cruiserweight
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 961
Rep Power: 7
Dkingz is on a distinguished road
Default

It's not the PG it's the writers.
Dkingz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 Jun 2014, 05:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Loves Natalie Portman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 693
Rep Power: 0
Tommy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Tommy
Default

WWE is not quite as entertaining as it was back in the Attitude Era I'll admit, but to flat out say the WWE is a joke and that TNA is BETTER than the WWE is just asinine. The WWE is doing pretty well nowadays for what it's worth.































TV Age Ratings has nothing to do with how good the product can be. If that is the case then why is TNA struggling so badly? How good a product can be is all down to the creative team. It has nothing to do with TV Age Ratings.































TNA fanboys will use any excuse they can come up with to defend their precious dying Promotion. They are in denial and will go to any lengths they can to bring the WWE down and make TNA look better. They will go out of their way to point out any small and insignificant flaws they can find within the WWE product just to make TNA look better by comparison. It's kinda pathetic really.































Just because a product is rated PG doesn't mean it can't be entertaining.
Tommy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 Jun 2014, 05:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 0
Thomas is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Thomas
Default

they need to bring back undertaker and stone cold then the ratings will go back up
Thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 Jun 2014, 05:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,029
Rep Power: 6
Jay26 is on a distinguished road
Default

Why do you have to bring up TNA.my question was simply,what makes WWE PG so great.never said TNA was Great,and never said it was better than WWE.my question had nothing to do with TNA,but TNA does get way to much hate.































I been a WWE fan since the attitude era,so it isn't great compared to the attitude era.WWE PG is more catered to kids,Attitude era and ruthless agression era was awesome.
Jay26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 Jul 2016, 02:50 AM   #8 (permalink)
Fresh Noob
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
LarryCraft is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Why do people think that just because WWE is PG, that it sucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Everett View Post
It does suck most of those chicks are straight up whores. Damn this is PG. I forgot I cant use that word. The only diva in this era I have respect for is Eve Torres.
Eve Torres is a hot chick.. And what about Kaitlyn and MELINA? Love Melina. She is like a character from the Robert Rodrigues film
LarryCraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some people say Jack swagger sucks? Jay26 General Wrestling 10 06 May 2014 02:42 PM
Why do people say the BullHammer sucks? Raven General Wrestling 2 20 Sep 2013 04:13 AM
Why do people say wrestler RVD sucks? Sultan Ali General Wrestling 4 24 Apr 2011 02:19 AM
It's Funny how People We're Bashing RAW Saying this Sucks but Now everything Changes; WHY? The Animalistic-Viper LP23 General Wrestling 9 08 Jun 2010 12:37 PM
cena sucks,why dont people get it? Tom General Wrestling 22 08 Mar 2010 08:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Attribution:
Powered by Yahoo Answers



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.