![]() |
|
General Wrestling Any non-WWE/TNA wrestling discussion goes in here. This includes wrestling history. |
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
Fresh Noob
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
![]()
WWE used to always look over their "skinner" talent per say, i mean the it factor is what triple h's body was thats what they wanted, but now their realizing that not many superstars with tht kind of body can do much so Size always did matter but not it doesnt so much
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Jobber
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 413
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
![]()
Size matters but attitude carries. The biggest stars in wrestling who have the biggest impact create characters that are loved or hated and somtimes both. Cena would never had made it without attitude neither would have Orton. And if size truly mattered there would be no Chris Jericho or the immortal...the Heartbreak Kid...Shawn Micheals.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WRESTLING : TRUE/FALSE : The wwe would be better off with 1 champion? | the man | General Wrestling | 3 | 27 Nov 2013 11:10 AM |
Wrestling : TRUE/FALSE : Albert del rio is better off going to TNA? | Marcus (Prince Of Saying) | General Wrestling | 3 | 18 Aug 2013 11:37 PM |
Wrestling : Does size always matters in the ring? | Marcus ? | General Wrestling | 4 | 13 Aug 2013 07:03 PM |
Is this true: SmackDown= Wrestling Matters? | ?¢?????? ?.?? T?? C???? | General Wrestling | 3 | 07 Jul 2011 05:38 PM |
....of course size matters | Kurt Angle | Off-Topic | 9 | 13 Nov 2004 08:23 PM |