ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum

Go Back   ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum > Wrestling > General Wrestling

General Wrestling Any non-WWE/TNA wrestling discussion goes in here. This includes wrestling history.

WWE OR TNA WHICH IS BETTER AND WHY?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 Apr 2013, 12:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Young Noob
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 7
Bobbi is on a distinguished road
Default WWE OR TNA WHICH IS BETTER AND WHY?

I AM A HULK HOGAN FAN SO SHUT UP
Bobbi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 12:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
Cruiserweight
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 816
Rep Power: 0
Michelle is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Michelle
Default

WWE. TNA will never be bigger then the WWE
Michelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 12:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,052
Rep Power: 9
The Rassling Critic is on a distinguished road
Default

neither is perfect. TNA needs to fire hogan.
The Rassling Critic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 12:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 7
Moe Money is on a distinguished road
Default

TNA, better at using talent in my opinion.































WWE is still #1, but TNA has yet to fail me as far as entertainment goes (except for Sting beating Jeff Hardy in 90 seconds, but that was relatively a long time ago). WWE has let me down many times, to the point where the crowd from last RAW was more entertaining than Wrestlemania 29 itself.































Also, TNA has faster paced matches with better spots, and it is more unpredictable. WWE is more mainstream and can pull in larger crowds, but quantity and quality are two different boats to me. Everyone in TNA is main event worthy, but in WWE, only a select handful is.
Moe Money is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 12:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DeRuyter
Posts: 149
Rep Power: 0
Austin is on a distinguished road
Default

WWE. TNA is just not good enough to compare.
Austin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 12:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
Fresh Noob
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 0
Meti is on a distinguished road
Default

Tna has less crowd in their matches but i think good storylines
Meti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 12:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 304
Rep Power: 0
jake is on a distinguished road
Default

WWE FOR SURE,tna's wrestlers are very old,and when you watch it,its not the same, the wrestling seem soooooo fake in tna,and they always hang on to people who have so little left in them like hogan.
jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 12:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 0
Thomas is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Thomas
Default

WWE is better. Not because it has more money, not because it has more viewers, not because it has better talent, but because Vince Mcmahon has the final say. That's why the AWA folded, it's why WCW lost the Monday night war and it's why Hulk Hogan works for TNA.
Thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 01:02 PM   #9 (permalink)
Fresh Noob
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 0
deaddodge187 is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm sick of this question that everybody's been asking for sometime now, just watch WWE and TNA, then you'll know which one's better.
deaddodge187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Apr 2013, 01:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
Young Noob
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 5
insloanwetrust is on a distinguished road
Default

Well I've been a fan of WWF/E since about 1997 and a fan of TNA since 2003. I think the best era was the attitude era in terms of story lines, characters and matches. I think WWE is better at production, character development and story lines. They have a much larger fan base, better product, more money and are more mainstream. They know how to put on a show and sell one.































TNA for me has the better wrestlers, wrestling matches and when they had the six sided ring it was the best. From 2004/5 - 08 they where the best company in terms of pure wrestling for me. Their matches where unique and it was a breath of fresh air. WWE went PG and TNA was needed.































Now TNA has went backwards and WWE has slightly gotten better in the last few years but it's still no where near attitude era or even relentless aggression standards.































They are both good for different reasons and I prefer TNA for pure wrestling and WWE for everything else.
insloanwetrust is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Attribution:
Powered by Yahoo Answers



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.