How disappointed where you that Bobbie Roode did not win the title after all that buildup?

Starhawke Coma · 18 Oct 2011, 10:58 PM

or do you think Kurt Angle retaining was better for TNA

RazorRamon ??? W???? ????? · 18 Oct 2011, 11:02 PM

I was rooting for Kurt Angle, so..... I'm not disappointed.

Pete · 18 Oct 2011, 11:10 PM

It was pretty disappointing. That pretty much showed that the tournament was a waste all along. I liked the idea of a tournament that was meant to push new stars but after seeing where it led, it does not seem legitimate. I like Kurt Angle but I think he should have lost to Bobby Roode although the result was out of Kurt's hands.

Superior Quality 85? (PTSF) · 18 Oct 2011, 11:16 PM

It was disappointing having had all of that momentum and builtup in Roode to have lost the match that way, such cheapness, such terrible booking. It didn't even make both guys that much stronger, where TNA could give back momentum to Roode and have him continue on a title shot. I really would like to have seen someone who has worked for TNA since near enough the beginning. Joe, Styles got their shots, why can't Roode? It's TNA's booking, booking so slowly that they give titles to people who's build got lost about 6 months ago

K????????? ??????d ?Aþ?x? · 18 Oct 2011, 11:22 PM

Definitely disappointed. Overall I definitely though that this was a very bad booking move by TNA officials.

It made no sense for TNA investing the last 3-4 months to get Roode over. They had him win the BFG Series and you pushed him hard leading up into his title match. He does everything possible to make himself look strong. They put so much stock in how Roode has sacrificed this and how winning the world title means everything to the guy, but then have him lose? Now I know he could win at the next PPV but what were they thinking? They invested so much time in the BFG series only to have the winner lose? Not only that, but invested all this stock in Roode only for him to fail.

It doesn't make any sense to spend much time and energy to build up Roode in winning the World title at the biggest show of the year than have it lead to nothing. It's stuff like this that makes TNA the company they are. They have so much potential, but they have too many creative staff members with a stick up their *** and don't know when to stick down the path as opposed to taking 5 million detours along the way.

18 Oct 2011, 10:58 PM	#1 (permalink)
Starhawke Coma Young Noob Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 67 Rep Power: 8	How disappointed where you that Bobbie Roode did not win the title after all that buildup? or do you think Kurt Angle retaining was better for TNA

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Was Bobbie Roode screwed against Kurt Angle in the title match at BFG?	Starhawke Coma	General Wrestling	3	17 Oct 2011 08:44 AM
Do you think Bobby Roode will cry if he wins the TNA Title at Bound For Glory?	Senor Booker	General Wrestling	7	30 Sep 2011 09:02 PM
Do you think WWE only wants Robert Roode+BQ?	Kenny Rogers	General Wrestling	7	25 Aug 2011 06:02 PM
Best buildup to a finisher?	I_ll Make You Tap!	General Wrestling	8	12 Aug 2010 04:12 PM
What was Batista's Overall Best Fued: Matches and Promo's/Buildup: The Undertaker,	The Animalistic-Viper LP23	General Wrestling	2	26 May 2010 10:22 PM

18 Oct 2011, 11:02 PM	#2 (permalink)
RazorRamon ??? W???? ????? Jobber Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 120 Rep Power: 8	I was rooting for Kurt Angle, so..... I'm not disappointed.

18 Oct 2011, 11:10 PM	#3 (permalink)
Pete Fresh Noob Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 37 Rep Power: 0	It was pretty disappointing. That pretty much showed that the tournament was a waste all along. I liked the idea of a tournament that was meant to push new stars but after seeing where it led, it does not seem legitimate. I like Kurt Angle but I think he should have lost to Bobby Roode although the result was out of Kurt's hands.

18 Oct 2011, 11:16 PM	#4 (permalink)
Superior Quality 85? (PTSF) Jobber Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 450 Rep Power: 9	It was disappointing having had all of that momentum and builtup in Roode to have lost the match that way, such cheapness, such terrible booking. It didn't even make both guys that much stronger, where TNA could give back momentum to Roode and have him continue on a title shot. I really would like to have seen someone who has worked for TNA since near enough the beginning. Joe, Styles got their shots, why can't Roode? It's TNA's booking, booking so slowly that they give titles to people who's build got lost about 6 months ago

18 Oct 2011, 11:22 PM	#5 (permalink)
K????????? ??????d ?Aþ?x? Jobber Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 212 Rep Power: 8	Definitely disappointed. Overall I definitely though that this was a very bad booking move by TNA officials. It made no sense for TNA investing the last 3-4 months to get Roode over. They had him win the BFG Series and you pushed him hard leading up into his title match. He does everything possible to make himself look strong. They put so much stock in how Roode has sacrificed this and how winning the world title means everything to the guy, but then have him lose? Now I know he could win at the next PPV but what were they thinking? They invested so much time in the BFG series only to have the winner lose? Not only that, but invested all this stock in Roode only for him to fail. It doesn't make any sense to spend much time and energy to build up Roode in winning the World title at the biggest show of the year than have it lead to nothing. It's stuff like this that makes TNA the company they are. They have so much potential, but they have too many creative staff members with a stick up their *** and don't know when to stick down the path as opposed to taking 5 million detours along the way.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)