ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum

Go Back   ProWrestling Fans WWE TNA Forum > Wrestling > General Wrestling

General Wrestling Any non-WWE/TNA wrestling discussion goes in here. This includes wrestling history.

Do you prefer Large Stables or Small Stables?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 Dec 2010, 12:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 343
Rep Power: 7
The Codebreaker is on a distinguished road
Default Do you prefer Large Stables or Small Stables?

Large Stables are usually 5 or more members while Small Stables are usually 3 or 4.































BQ- What's the difference between WWE being PG in the Golden Era and PG now?















BQ2- How to do you Unlock The Hurricane on SvR 2011?















BQ3- Do you prefer Rosa Mendas's Legs or booty?
The Codebreaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 Dec 2010, 12:07 AM   #2 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 103
Rep Power: 8
*THE BEST THERE IS* is on a distinguished road
Default

large































bg lame cool















cant















booty
*THE BEST THERE IS* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 Dec 2010, 12:12 AM   #3 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 104
Rep Power: 7
My Apex Love! *Viperette* is on a distinguished road
Default

It really depends on their power and strength, but I usually prefer small stable. If a group of only 3 or 4 guys can make a big impact, that's impressive and awesome. Big ones are cool too but it gets a bit sloppy sometimes.































BQ; There were different, better storylines. Personally, I don't see how PG can make that huge a difference. People who make a big deal over it don't see the elements PG could posess.































BQ2; That, I don't know. Sorry. Google it.































BQ3; Legs? I'm a girl. I don't know.
My Apex Love! *Viperette* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 Dec 2010, 12:22 AM   #4 (permalink)
Heavyweight
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,144
Rep Power: 9
Rassling Fundamentals is on a distinguished road
Default

Let's see who was successful:































1. Four Horsemen had around 5 members if you count JJ Dillion acting as the advisor/manager















2. Hart Foundation started as a tag team then grew to include Owen, Bulldog, Pillman















































Failures:































NWO had half of the damn promotion and eventually had splinter groups changing colors every few months.....it got so much out of hand that its confusion eventually killed WCW.































Ministry had 20 or so members and the only person over was the leader































Dungeon of Doom had alot of mid card jabronies































Spirit Squad did nothing but job out to DX....no known survivors....Nicky had to hide out for years to reinvent himself































Nexus did nothing but job out to Cena.....only Wade Barrett is over
Rassling Fundamentals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 Dec 2010, 12:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
Jobber
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 106
Rep Power: 7
kydragon is on a distinguished road
Default

To me it really depends. Evolution worked as a four-man stable, but if it's more like taking over a brand/company, it needs to be 5 or over































BQ1 - The fans expect more now than they did then. Back in the Golden Era, people was happy with chain wrestling matches, now people would leave the room or change the channel. People want more edgy and realistic WWE now, while then people were satisfied with the gimmicks because that's all they had. They didn't have competition with edgier TV and better matches, and all around better divisions than the WWE does now (There's no way you can deny TNA outdoing WWE in both Tag and Women's divisions at least)















BQ2 - You can't. WWE told THQ to make it where you can't unlock him. You might be able to hack it and get him though















BQ3 - My Diva focus on SmackDown is on Kaitlyn, sorry.
kydragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 Dec 2010, 12:32 AM   #6 (permalink)
Cruiserweight
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 736
Rep Power: 8
TJanssen411 is on a distinguished road
Default

4-5 is perfect















That way they have















-- a Tag team















-- a Mid Card Contender/Champ















-- a Main event Contender/Champ















-- w/ 5 either a Manager who can bump or a 'blocker' (the mid card guy who would be a main event contender. if he weren't the Champ's Henchman)































B1: the TV 14 attitude in between showing what could be... and the PG box in the corner Telling people that it is PG.















B2: You Don't. he's a non playable... supposedly he was viable in beta, but they locked the code-- the only way to play as him now is to hack the system -- or find a CAW















B3: More of a Navel man myself... and her skits have been random/comedy as of late, which I tune out despite her hotness
TJanssen411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WWE needs more tag teams stables? Jerry94 General Wrestling 8 08 Mar 2010 04:50 PM
Stables Nick Saban General Wrestling 4 21 Jun 2004 03:00 PM
Stables Kryptonite World Wrestling Entertainment 24 23 Oct 2003 10:16 PM
Stables? The Raven Archives 26 23 Jan 2003 08:09 PM
Stables??? ~Y2A~ Archives 76 20 Sep 2002 02:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.

Attribution:
Powered by Yahoo Answers



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.