View Single Post
Old 06 Mar 2004, 01:43 AM   #6 (permalink)
Dre
It's 4:19 Got a Minute?
 
Dre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,089
Rep Power: 98
Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...Dre , I can't believe you got THIS far...
Default

Well the way I see it is the same way I always have and voiced on this very forum. From the get go I always said that one Hardy was better then the other. I alsways said one Hardy wouldn't be able to go the distance because he isn't capable of getting the job done inside of the ring. I said Matt has the potential, the skill, the drive and the ability to be a huge star. I then would follow up by saying Jeff will get the bigger push much like Michaels did with the Rockers. However Jeff would never be able to keep up with the demand and the schedule, while trying to fit in his own personal life into the fold. Jeff Hardy was an areil wrestler. He wasn't good at working the mat. He had no true triditional skills that could make a match mainevent worthy. He was a brawler to a certain extant, yet he would in most cases come out on the short end of the stick. He was by no means a power wrestler, his mic skills were below par and since he was pretty much a one deminsional wrestler he would never be able to get completly over or be a good champion. If anyone saw the last year and a half of Jeff in the WWE then you would know what I mean. The kidd was botching everything. More then anyone on TE ever did in his match's. Then when he left WWE, he still wrestled with the same attitude. Half assed it in the match's and showed that he doesn't have his head completly in the game.

Matt to me comes off as the harder worker. One reason is because he has stuck with the WWE for a legitimate amount of time. And he given it his all at all times. He is a great preformer. Able to be an areial wrestler, a triditional wrestler, a brawler at times and a technical wrestler when it gets down to it. Matt is very much skilled in the ways to work a great match. He also unlike his brother can cut great promo's and his charisma inside and outside of the ring. Something that Jeff really only obtains inside the ring on a good night. Matt is able to wrestle in a cruiserwieght or heavyweight atmoshphere and seem like he's been doing it for 10 years. I like Matt better, for so many more reasons then I can even think of. But Jeff to me, just isn't that good as everyone beilieves. Its the finisher that people seem to be attracted to. Whatever someone's got to like that usless swanton, lol......
__________________


Last edited by Dre; 06 Mar 2004 at 01:47 AM.
Dre is offline   Reply With Quote
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254